Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 


waiting with countless others
to be taken and filled
or to fall.

The latter, though not ideal,
does have its attraction:

the satisfying sound
as you shatter;  

the collective turn of heads;

the chance that when you're swept up
and binned into oblivion,
someone might get cut.

He could handle that,
the momentary relevance.

What shakes him is the fear
his fellows will soon have gone,
whilst he -- the slighted last --  –  

remains alone.
©2009-2010 ~hermionegreen
:iconhermionegreen:

Author's Comments

This is for writers-workshop's "More Metaphor Please" workshop. As seems to be the theme with my dA submissions, I wrote this far too quickly -- I'm sure it still needs a lot of work, but I made myself submit it anyway because extended metaphor is not something I do a great deal of.

Feedback much appreciated!

Comments


love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconchaldemone:
You switch pronouns from "he" to "you" at stanzas three and five.
"the chance that when you're swept up" seems a bit too long of a line given the length of your other lines. Maybe split it into two lines? I also suggest adding a colon after this: "What shakes him is the secret fear".

Other than that, I rather like your piece (which is actually rather rare of me to say about poems in "open form").

--
William Faulkner: "The past is never dead; it's not even past."

If I didn't comment on something, it means it's good enough that I have nothing to criticise. It may be fantastic, but you can improve it somehow.
:iconnathanwhitaker:
This is really good. There are a few grammar mistakes that, even for poetry, need to be fixed ... I think ...

"The latter, though not ideal,
does have its attraction:"

Colons can only be used for lists which you do go into ...

"the satisfying sound
as you shatter;

the collective turn of heads;

the chance that when you're swept up
and binned into oblivion,
someone might get cut."

However you use a semicolon and I'm not sure that pairing of semicolons and a colon is correct. Could someone who's more grammatically experienced comment more on this please?

--
My Livejournal

Axiomatic Linguistics and Graphemics
:iconnathanwhitaker:
Okay that clears it up perfectly. *writing down a few notes*

Charldemone I wasn't intending for this to be a wild tangent. My intention wasn't to prove you wrong, I was simpley trying to get clarification because I have never heard of this rule.

--
My Livejournal

Axiomatic Linguistics and Graphemics
:iconchaldemone:
Semicolons may be used to replace commas separating "items" (if you will) in a list when there are commas within the "items".

--
William Faulkner: "The past is never dead; it's not even past."

If I didn't comment on something, it means it's good enough that I have nothing to criticise. It may be fantastic, but you can improve it somehow.
:iconnathanwhitaker:
But in the example listed only one of the items has a comma in it:

the chance that when you're swept up
and binned into oblivion,
someone might get cut.

--
My Livejournal

Axiomatic Linguistics and Graphemics
:iconchaldemone:
One is enough to cause confusion, methinks. Consider:
(1) "blah blah blah: a, b, c, when d, e" versus
(2) "blah blah blah: a; b; c; when d, e" versus
(3) "blah blah blah: a, b, c; when d, e".

(1) seems grammatically incorrect to me because if it were a list, there would be an "and" between "c," and "when". In the case that "when d, e" is a separate sentence, the comma after c should be a semicolon.

(2) conveys a list. I think it's pretty self-evident, but perhaps that's just because I'm accustomed to this rule.

(3) conveys two separate clauses. Again, I think this to be fairly self-evident, but perhaps you disagree.

I don't know if this helped or not, and I'm sorry to ~hermionegreen for this wild tangent on her deviation. :XD: We can continue this via notes if you're still confused and think I could help.

--
William Faulkner: "The past is never dead; it's not even past."

If I didn't comment on something, it means it's good enough that I have nothing to criticise. It may be fantastic, but you can improve it somehow.
:icongwenavhyeuranastasia:
The only part that messes me up a bit is how you switch from speaking about 'him' to 'you'. I rather like the idea though, and it's my favorite so far. :]

--
:boing:
*dALinkSystem | #Writers-Workshop | #project-improve | #LITplease | *Lit-Twitter | =DeviantArtSecret
:boing:
:iconhermionegreen:
Thank you very much!

Hmm, I'll try to explain myself coherently. Imagine that you're telling someone a story about someone else: "She was walking to the shop for some milk when she slipped on the pavement -- you know how slippery concrete gets in the rain -- and scraped her knee terribly". The "you"is a way of involving the reader in the story, of engaging their imagination, because you put them in the place of the person you're telling them about.

Make more sense? Apologies if it's a rambling mess: I am not good at this.

--
Link
:icongwenavhyeuranastasia:
Ah, that does make sense. I should've seen that. Duh me!

--
:boing:
*dALinkSystem | #Writers-Workshop | #project-improve | #LITplease | *Lit-Twitter | =DeviantArtSecret
:boing:

Found in these Groups:

group avatar #Writers-Workshop
Where writers workshop writing!

Details

November 8, 2009
713 bytes

Statistics

23
11 [who?]
101 (0 today)
1 (0 today)

Share

Link
Thumb

Site Map